India's Shaky Protection for Rajasthan Tigers and Tribal People
Introduction:
(scroll to the bottom of this post to see the photo album)
(scroll to the bottom of this post to see the photo album)
Our eyes met. The large, round yellow eyes did not blink.
They were as still as the eyes of
a porcelain tiger. The cream, black stripes, and
orange of its face blended with the colours of the leafless, brown, thicket.
The face was utterly at ease, at peace! It had no fear. I was stunned, breathless, and unable
to utter even one word! My body had gone limp. It could not move! All my strength
had vanished in a flash. The tiger remained absolutely still just like
me. The powerless one had finally met the all-powerful!
My sense of reality, my sense of being had begun to move in slow motion. It was like the feeling of my life hanging in the balance. Like the feeling that came over me five years ago. My speeding Subaru Impreza had almost collided with a moose one snowy night just before Christmas Eve in northwest British Columbia, Canada!
I had dared to look the tiger in the eyes. This was a
demonstration of aggression to the tiger. It was easy for me to do! I was in
the safety of the safari jeep's front seat. But my spirit did not come to
flaunt my intrusion in its domain. Nor did I come to provoke the spirit of the tiger god of
India's Tribal People. Instead, I had come in peace to gaze at its beauty, its
magnificence, to learn about its reality, to see if I could do something to
strengthen its reign.
As I looked through the brush on the left
side of the jeep, I saw the large tiger lying on its stomach! I still couldn't
believe it. I was the first to see it!
Finally I was able to move, to lift my arm, to point at it in amazement! But I was still in awe, still voiceless!
Within seconds, the jeep stopped at a hairpin corner that turned to the left. We faced the tiger head on! It was still lying 25 meters away at the edge of the road where it split into two directions.
Incredibly the young
American man from Seattle jumped out of the rear of the jeep! Then I heard the feet of the
second young man from Israel hit the ground behind me. Immediately our guide shouted out
in alarm, "Get back into the jeep!" The men obeyed. Then we backed
away from it a few vehicle lengths. This is how we began a ten-minute encounter
with the tiger right at sundown!
The tiger laid calmly at
the edge of the dusty, road surface. It stretched its neck, and tilted its
head back. Then the tiger opened its jaws wide in silence, baring its fangs! He
was putting on a show for us!
Looking back on my experience I have to say I was pretty naive at the start of the safaris. I had no idea what I was getting myself into. Nevertheless, this incredible encounter was my inspiration to dedicate one month of research, reading, analysis, and writing immediately after my return home to Canada. The result of this work appears in this article.
I will tell you about my
personal experience in a search for a tiger at one of our planet's great
wildlife reserves. It is called the Ranthambore
Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan, India. Through the eyes of an indigenous man from
Canada, this essay examines its physical geography, the tribal people in and
around the reserve, and conservation issues that challenge the very existence
of the reserve and its tigers. My personal photographs will enhance the article
to show you the majesty and power of the tiger.
![]() |
| Ranthambore Tiger Reserve location (orange pin). |
I will briefly discuss the threats to tiger
survival. Visitors in the tiger reserve and villagers near the tiger
reserve both threaten and conserve the tiger population and its reserve. My personal observations will provide some evidence of the threats to tiger survival. The reactions to a high court decision of June'12 in India for a temporary
ban of tourists from the core area of tiger reserves will add more food for thought about
the politics of tiger conservation (McCarthy, 2012). In
addition, the fieldwork by H.S. Sharma published in 2000 provides very
important insight into the social, economic and cultural conditions in the
area. Furthermore, I will rely on the research by Tarun Nair, Program
Coordinator at Gharial Conservation Alliance, to examine some of the
consequences of hundreds of irrigation projects in the Chambal watershed that
encompasses the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve.
This amazing sanctuary
in northwestern India, near Sawai Madhopur in the state of Rajasthan, was to
host my tiger safaris for five, fantastic days (March 18-22, 2013). I had gone
to the sanctuary to see one charismatic species, the Bengal Tiger (Panthera tigris tigris). But, my eyes
were soon opened to many challenging issues! I saw widespread conservation and
social justice issues. An immense human population and wildlife intensely
compete for scare resources in their daily struggle for life. Through personal
observations during my brief visit, I was to learn how humans threaten tiger
survival in this sanctuary near the Great Indian Desert.
As for me, I chose to
visit Ranthambore Tiger Reserve for a few important reasons. The reserve has a
large Bengal Tiger population. The heat of the nearby Great Indian Desert
produces a semi-arid climate in the sanctuary. Thus, all forests would be thin.
![]() |
| Five reserves were combined to establish the current Ranthambore Tiger Reserve. |
After my return to
Canada from my pilgrimage, I was to learn that during recent decades, tigers at
Ranthambore have become so accustomed to humans that they began appearing in
daylight. Soon, international experts found it to be the best place on Earth to
see wild tigers. Hence, National Geographic, BBC and leading wildlife film
companies and photographers like to go to the sanctuary to film tigers. This
validates my thinking about doing photography in this reserve.
Ranthambore consists of
several protected areas. This post will tell you the story of my first tiger
encounter. It took place in Zone 9 in the Kualji Game Reserve (see the map
above). It is at the southernmost part of the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve.
Thus, it would be useful to take a look at a few
important features about the physical geography of the basin.
The Physical Geography:
Grasslands cover the thinly forested ridges. It is a Northern
Tropical Dry Deciduous Forest, “the single largest expanse of dry deciduous
Anogeissus pendula Forest left intact in India” (Afroz Alam, 2011). In contrast
to lush forest stands near water bodies in narrow canyons known to locals as
"Khohs" (Afroz Alam, 2011), the flat, valley floor near Kualji Game Reserve looks like a desert with thin vegetation. Consequently, the
chances are much better for a visitor like me to see tigers. This is why I
chose Ranthambore for my wildlife, photographic 'pilgrimage' to India. All in
all, I took 60 GB of stills and video during my visit in India. I will share a
few of my photos with you in this blog.
The Great
Boundary Fault passes about 10 km to the west of Sawai Madhopur (Srivastava,
2003). A Goggle Earth satellite image of the park clearly shows the Great
Boundary Fault. It passes through Ranthambore Tiger Reserve.
The ancient Aravalli lies on the west side of the fault. The younger Vindhyan basin stretches to the east side. The Great Boundary Fault marked a collision location of tectonic plates eons before the present Indian sub-continent collided with Asia (Kaur et al., 2011) beginning 55 million years ago (Aitchison et al., 2007). The sandstone layers of the Vindhyan hills are typically flat at the top (tablelands). Locals call them "dangs". They end abruptly at steep escarpments.
Tree in the house:
During road travel to Zone 9 on March 20, we passed through ten villages and towns in rural India. Zone 9, which is outside the park, requires the most distant travel of all the zones in the Reserve. Thus, I also gained insight into the lives of some 60% of Indians who live in such rural areas.
At 1:30 pm, we left the Ranthambore Tourist Centre in Sawai Madhopur to begin the safari. The trip to Zone 9 was about 45 km. We stopped at two resorts to pick up passengers. As a result, we travelled for 90 minutes to get to our destination.
During road travel to Zone 9 on March 20, we passed through ten villages and towns in rural India. Zone 9, which is outside the park, requires the most distant travel of all the zones in the Reserve. Thus, I also gained insight into the lives of some 60% of Indians who live in such rural areas.
As we travelled through the villages and countryside, I observed activities in daily, rural life. Village wells and the associated water storage tank were always a social gathering place. The lives of the young women and a girl at the water tank of a village along our travel route intrigued me. After my return home to Canada I was to learn more about them. In rural Rajasthan, 65.7 per cent in rural areas of girls marry at an age of 15 years (Alka Barua, 2007). Thus, most females in this scene are probably married.
In one of the villages, we saw a house built around a tree. It intrigues Canadians when they see
the photo below. The roof and walls have been carefully built around a large
tree. Freshly, laundered clothes hang on a clothesline in front of the house.
The sandy yard in front of the house is very clean and smooth. There is no sign
of animal use of the structure. Hence, humans appear to inhabit the house.
Why is the tree in the
house? The Meena Tribal People can be animists. For them, animals, plants and
trees can be deities. An individual tree or a grove of trees can be sacred.
Picking even a twig from such a tree can be blasphemy (Yogesh Shrivastava,
2001). It could make perfect sense for them to take special measures to protect
a sacred tree. Perhaps, this image of the tree in the house could be an
indication of a Meena belief and practice.
| House built around a tree. |
| Agriculture is the main activity of most Meena Tribe members. |
The Meena Tribe:
During the safari, I asked the tour guide about indigenous peoples. He affirmed that there were indigenous people around Ranthambore. Thus, it would be helpful to take a closer look at who they are.
The Indus civilization began in the Stone Age (2006). Thus, tribal people in India do not necessarily claim to be the original people of a region. However, they do make prior claims to the natural resources of the region that they inhabit (Xaxa, 1999).
Tribal people comprise 8 percent of India's population (84.51 million) according to the 2001 census. They occupy 15 percent of the sub-continent of India in several ecological and climatic zones. There are 697 tribes specially recognized in the Constitution of India (2011b).
The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) was founded in 1968 by anthropologists who were alarmed about the genocide of indigenous peoples in the Amazon. It continues its work to the present day in a global network. Today, indigenous peoples from all over the world are involved in its rights-based approach. IWGIA recognizes Scheduled Tribes in India as being indigenous peoples (2013d).
To enact provisions of the Constitution of India, administrators define scheduled tribes according to certain criteria. The criteria can include geographic isolation, low standard of living, and their practice of animism, physical features, language, customs, and traditions that are different from mainstream Hindu society (Xaxa, 1999).
The Constitution of India protects tribal people. It provides privileges, benefits and security to them. What is more, in 1950, the Constitution provided self-governance powers to tribal people in areas where they are the majority in the population (2011a).
In India, however, the use of the term indigenous has been a term of considerable debate. Politicians, administrators, social workers, and academics used the term “indigenous” to refer to a category of disadvantaged people. Therefore, this identity was forced upon the Meena by the dominant society (Xaxa, 1999).
According to a researcher who had finished extensive fieldwork in 2000, most of the people in and around the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve are tribal people called the Meena (Sharma, 2000). They “are settled unlike other tribes in Rajasthan" (Sharma, 2000).
The Meena, also known as the Meos, or Mewati, or Minas, are a tribe and caste in parts of western and northern India. The Minas may have migrated to this region of India with various Rajput groups from inner Asia in the 7th century (2009).
Twelve tribes are scheduled for the State of Rajasthan. The Meena (Mina) tribe had a population of 3,799,971 in the 2001 census of India (Office of the Registrar General). Thus, the Meena, along with their allied groups, currently rank among the largest tribes of South Asia (2009). The Minas believe that “they were among the oldest inhabitants of the region” (2009).
The Indus civilization began in the Stone Age (2006). Thus, tribal people in India do not necessarily claim to be the original people of a region. However, they do make prior claims to the natural resources of the region that they inhabit (Xaxa, 1999).
Tribal people comprise 8 percent of India's population (84.51 million) according to the 2001 census. They occupy 15 percent of the sub-continent of India in several ecological and climatic zones. There are 697 tribes specially recognized in the Constitution of India (2011b).
The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) was founded in 1968 by anthropologists who were alarmed about the genocide of indigenous peoples in the Amazon. It continues its work to the present day in a global network. Today, indigenous peoples from all over the world are involved in its rights-based approach. IWGIA recognizes Scheduled Tribes in India as being indigenous peoples (2013d).
To enact provisions of the Constitution of India, administrators define scheduled tribes according to certain criteria. The criteria can include geographic isolation, low standard of living, and their practice of animism, physical features, language, customs, and traditions that are different from mainstream Hindu society (Xaxa, 1999).
The Constitution of India protects tribal people. It provides privileges, benefits and security to them. What is more, in 1950, the Constitution provided self-governance powers to tribal people in areas where they are the majority in the population (2011a).
In India, however, the use of the term indigenous has been a term of considerable debate. Politicians, administrators, social workers, and academics used the term “indigenous” to refer to a category of disadvantaged people. Therefore, this identity was forced upon the Meena by the dominant society (Xaxa, 1999).
According to a researcher who had finished extensive fieldwork in 2000, most of the people in and around the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve are tribal people called the Meena (Sharma, 2000). They “are settled unlike other tribes in Rajasthan" (Sharma, 2000).
The Meena, also known as the Meos, or Mewati, or Minas, are a tribe and caste in parts of western and northern India. The Minas may have migrated to this region of India with various Rajput groups from inner Asia in the 7th century (2009).
Twelve tribes are scheduled for the State of Rajasthan. The Meena (Mina) tribe had a population of 3,799,971 in the 2001 census of India (Office of the Registrar General). Thus, the Meena, along with their allied groups, currently rank among the largest tribes of South Asia (2009). The Minas believe that “they were among the oldest inhabitants of the region” (2009).
We arrived at the gate to Zone
9 at 3 pm. The guide went into the
Forest Check Post (Qualji) to speak to the Rangers. The Rangers told him that they heard
a tiger roar at noon. Then a warning call from deer was real close to the
station. A small farming community is across the road from the station gate. So
the tiger was still near the station.
| Gate to Eco-tourism Centre at Zone 9. |
After a short stop at the Check Post, we drove forest roads close to the station. Our search area was limited to a triangular-shaped area with an area of 1 square kilometer. Every 10 minutes or so, we stopped the jeep and listened for warning calls of deer or langurs (Semnopithecus dussumieri). Zone 9 is the home of one male and two to three female tigers.
In addition, we looked
for fresh scat; fresh sloth bear and tiger paw prints on the dusty road
surface. We also made frequent checks of a water hole and a tributary to the
Chambal.
The river tributary was
so low that it had stopped flowing. There were just pools along the riverbed.
Therefore, humans, life stock, and wild animals can easily wander across the
dry riverbed. Our guide drove us in the jeep for about 1 km along the riverbed.
| Sambar (Cervus unicolour) visits the water hole to drink and wallow in the mud. |
![]() |
Zone 9 search locations in the Kualji Game Reserve.
|
This is how we searched
the area close to the Check Post. We drove the same route for three hours until
sunset, criss-crossing the same small area, the riverbed, and around two
watering holes. We paid close attention to the water holes because tigers need
water every hour during hot days. And the temperature on this day was 35 C. In
one month the temperature will rise to 40 to 50 C.
Hindi surprise:
Hindi surprise:
Around 6 pm, we needed a
break too. Our guide stopped the jeep. We sat in silence to listen for warning
calls. Instead, we heard a different kind of sound!
After three hours of
listening to the Indian men speak Hindi during our search for a tiger, a young
American white woman from Seattle who was sitting in the back seat of the jeep
finally spoke up! In Hindi! All of us were amazed! The Indians laughed
nervously. They had spoken Hindi during the entire safari.
The tour guide and driver
complimented her on her ability to speak Hindi so well. I spoke to her, as well
from the passenger seat in the front seat, "You are a humble woman to
remain silent for so long!" Her big smile was an affirmation of her
appreciation to me for noticing her way of entering a foreign culture.
Sunset
encounter with the tiger:
The Guide began to drive
the same circuit again. This time we saw fresh tracks of a tiger and a bear.
Finally at sunset, we found a really fresh place where a tiger had lied down in
the thick dust on the road surface. Our guide excitedly called on all of us to
search the bush beside the road as he drove.
Looking through the
brush on the left side of the jeep, I saw the striped face of a tiger looking
at me! I couldn't believe it. I was the first to see the tiger through the bush
on my side of the jeep! I was stunned when our eyes met!
I stood up on the
passenger seat to take photos. I laid my big telephoto lens on the top edge of
the windshield. Then I tried to control my excitement as I began taking photos.
My D7000 camera was
taking photos as fast as possible in Continuous High mode (up to 6 photos/sec)
shutter release mode. I had to pause several times during the photo shoot to
allow the memory card to save the photos in raw and jpg format. Thus, the Class
10 transfer speed of the memory card was not fast enough for a situation like
this one.
According to my photo
sequence, the big male tiger remained lying down for four minutes. Then it got
up and began to walk very slowly away down the road. So, we
slowly followed it for 4-5 minutes. Then we stopped and backed away from it.
The guide told us the
male was T42. This tiger has killed two men. It's mate, T37, a female, 5 years
of age, died (2013b) of a heart failure on March 18 (2013a). This sad event
took place two days before my encounter with T42. So, the young male tiger
(T42) was staying close to the location of his dead mate.
After the ten-minute
encounter was over, we left the park, as it was getting dark. We stopped at the
gate to the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Ecotourism Centre on our way out of the
sanctuary. Our guide spoke to the Ranger at the gate. Then our guide asked me
to show my photos to the Ranger.
I showed him my best
photos. The Ranger used his cell phone to take a photo of my camera photo
display of the right side of the tiger. He wanted
positive identification of our sighting. For stripes on the side of the tiger
can determine the identity of the tiger just like human fingerprints.
As we drove through the countryside
and the villages, darkness descended upon us. I was amazed to witness every
house along the route was in darkness. Just a few street side
vendors had battery powered LED lights to decorate and light their carts.
Villagers were gathering on the streets to socialize in the coolness of the
evening. For me it was an unforgettable experience.
During the excitement of the encounter, I forgot to take a GPS reading of the location. However, I returned the next morning at sunrise to look for T42. The Rangers said the tiger had left the reserve. It went to a nearby lake. So, we did not stay long in Zone 9. However, I took a GPS reading where we encountered the tiger. It, therefore, provides the precise location of the encounter shown in the Goggle Earth Satellite image above.
Canadian First Nations comparable to the Meena Tribe:
The history
of Canada’s aboriginal people provides another way to understand the Meena
Tribe of India. Migration of some indigenous peoples in Canada also took place
through our history because of war, famine, and the colonial administration of
the original people of our country.
One tribe,
in the 1870s, the Anishnaubemowin (Saulteau) migrated westward from Manitoba to
Moberly Lake, B.C., following their leader's spiritual vision. The spiritual
vision of the Meena was that their descent was from the Matsya avatar, or fish
incarnation, of Vishnu (2013d). Thus, the history of the
Meena and the Saulteau First Nations could be comparable for spiritual reasons
since the Meena migrated to the present day Rajasthan from inner Asia in the
7th Century.
Another
example, a small number of Cree followed the fur trade from Eastern Canada.
They arrived at the edge of Gitxsan territory in northwestern British Columbia
during the early part of the 19th century. While these specific Cree were
tribal, and aboriginal people, the Gitxsan, the tribal people of northwestern
Canada whose oral history dates their presence in the Skeena watershed back to
the last ice age, would never agree that the Cree are indigenous to Gitxsan
territory. Still, these Cree do not claim to be indigenous to the area.
Similarly,
early in the 19th century, the Gitxsan gave permission to the Wet’suwet’en to
establish a village at Hagwilget. It is about 30 km inside of Gitxsan
territory. The permission was granted in 1823 because salmon could not pass a
rockslide in Hagwilget Canyon. There was no salmon upstream of the slide in the
Bulkley River. Consequently, the Wet’suwet’en migrated from their original
territory like the Meena tribal people of India. My ancestors were then able to
harvest salmon for their survival at the present village site of Hagwilget. The
Wet'suwet'en are indigenous to their birthplace, 20 km upstream of Hagwilget at
a place called Dizkle. Hence, the Wet’suwet’en are tribal and aboriginal, but
not indigenous to Hagwilget.
Do
International Conventions and Declarations protect Tribal People in India?
Often wildlife seems to be more of a concern to the general public than indigenous people. What about the survival of tribal people? What tools and instruments could protect their rights, interests and survival of their cultures?
In 1957, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) adopted Convention No. 107 (C107) "Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention, 1957,"for the protection and integration of indigenous, tribal, and semi-tribal peoples in independent countries. India has ratified C107 (International Labour Organization (International Labour Organization (ILO), 2012).
In 1957, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) adopted Convention No. 107 (C107) "Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention, 1957,"for the protection and integration of indigenous, tribal, and semi-tribal peoples in independent countries. India has ratified C107 (International Labour Organization (International Labour Organization (ILO), 2012).
The convention has evolved over the years. In the 1980s, the
assimilationist approach of Convention No. 107 was considered outdated
(International Labour Organization (ILO), 2010). Therefore, the Convention was
revised and replaced in 1989 by Convention No. 169. Thus, ILO Convention No.
169 (C169) now "is a legally binding international instrument open to
ratification, which deals specifically with the rights of indigenous and tribal
peoples. Today, it has been ratified by 20 countries". However, India has
not ratified C169 (International Labour Organization (ILO), 2012).
C169 recognizes indigenous and tribal peoples’ aspirations
to exercise control over their own institutions, ways of life and economic
development and to maintain and develop their identities, languages and
religions. The crucial factor is that these processes would take place within
the framework of the states in which they live (International Labour
Organization (ILO), 2010). Thus, C169 mirrors the modern aspirations of First
Nations and Indigenous People of Canada. What is more, it has the potential to
be implemented in India too.
ILO supervisory bodies monitor the implementation of all ILO
Conventions. This allows a continuous dialogue to take place between the ILO
and the governments concerned with the hope of strengthening the implementation
of these Conventions. As a result, the first monitoring and report was done in
2009.
The supervisory body found at least eight violations of its
conventions. First, Vedanta Resources, a mining giant, aims to mine a sacred mountain for a large bauxite deposit and operate a processing facility in Niyamgiri
hills, Lanjigarh, in the state of Orissa. It threatens the existence and the way
of life of Dongria Kondh. Second, the ITUC calls on the Government of India to
establish a National
Tribal Policy and to adopt C169. Third, the Committee of the ITUC requests
the Government to provide information about the fulfillment of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional
Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. Fourth, the
Committee requests updated information on the tribal population displaced from
the land they traditionally occupy as a result of the Sardar Sarovar Dam
Project and the measures taken to guarantee their resettlement and compensation
in conformity with the Convention. Fifth, the Committee requests updated
information on the various measures taken in education, training and employment
and other areas for the benefit of the tribal population. Sixth, the Committee
repeatedly asks the Government to provide information on the specific measures
it has taken to intensify campaigns against caste-based discrimination in
employment and occupation. Seventh, in 2007, there were 104,003 cases before
the courts out of which 6,505 resulted in a conviction about the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Committee has called for strict
enforcement of these acts. Eighth, the Employment
of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993,
so far had been adopted by 20 states. Thus, the Committee of the ITUC calls for
enforcement of the act and to eliminate this illegal employment practice
(International Labour Organization (ILO), 2010).
The Committee of the International Trade Union Confederation
(ITUC), therefore, sent a communication to the Government of India for its
comment on September 3, 2009. By 2010, the government had not yet replied to
the above-mentioned eight serious violations of Tribal Peoples rights
(International Labour Organization (ILO), 2010). Therefore, India's
participation in the United Nations process does not appear to be done in good
faith. So, I have been waiting since May 13, 2013, for the ILO supervisory body to verify with me if it has
received an answer from India.
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), adopted by the General Assembly of the UN in September 2007, is not legally binding on countries. However, it establishes standards which countries recognize and politically and morally agree to uphold. Presently, 147 countries support the UNDRIP. India, the United States, and Canada have agreed to recognize the Declaration (2013b). The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Dr. James Anaya, promotes, monitors, assesses, and reports about its implementation. Since Dr. Anaya began his current term as Special Rapporteur, he has issued 17 country reports (2012b). However, he has not assessed India yet. So, reports and news releases by indigenous organizations in India and non-governmental organizations like Human Rights Watch and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees would require examination to determine the effectiveness of the UNDRIP in India.
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), adopted by the General Assembly of the UN in September 2007, is not legally binding on countries. However, it establishes standards which countries recognize and politically and morally agree to uphold. Presently, 147 countries support the UNDRIP. India, the United States, and Canada have agreed to recognize the Declaration (2013b). The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Dr. James Anaya, promotes, monitors, assesses, and reports about its implementation. Since Dr. Anaya began his current term as Special Rapporteur, he has issued 17 country reports (2012b). However, he has not assessed India yet. So, reports and news releases by indigenous organizations in India and non-governmental organizations like Human Rights Watch and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees would require examination to determine the effectiveness of the UNDRIP in India.
Parching
the Chambal River Basin:
Why were we able to drive on the riverbed of the tributary
to the Chambal? Tarun Nair, Program Coordinator at Gharial Conservation
Alliance, provided a compelling answer in his publication, "Parching the
Chambal River Basin: Unrelenting irrigation schemes wring the unique Chambal
dry."
Waters from the tributary at the south edge of Zone 9 and
the Chambal flows in a northeasterly direction through Rajasthan. Normally,
they would flow into the Ganges. However, a cluster of dams on the tributary
has reduced the flow to zero where it would normally empty into the Chambal.
Rajasthan has been known as the homeland of famine (Singh,
1998). Yet, the construction of hundreds of irrigation projects and dams
results in no river flow down stream of the Kota barrage. More than 200
irrigation projects and four major dams in the Chambal watershed have deprived
hundreds of birds, mammals, and aquatic species of life. The Chambal, normally
400 m wide, has been reduced to a channel just 10-15 m wide in certain
sections. Thus, aquatic ecosystems have been severely degraded or destroyed
throughout the basin (Nair, 2011).
One of the main threats to tiger survival in the Ranthambore
Tiger Reserve is an illegal canal that violates both the Wildlife Protection
Act and the Forest Conservation Act of India (Kavita Prasad, 2012). The illegal
construction of a canal, 10 m deep and 12 m wide, threatens to destroy the
crucial corridor that links two protected areas, the Ranthambore National Park
to the Sawai Mansingh Sanctuary (Tejpal, 2011). If the crazy canal is completed,
tiger movements between the two protected areas for breeding will be
impossible. Thus, two small isolated tiger populations will not be able to
maintain sufficient genetic variation for survival.
Incredibly, an ex-forest minister and local MP started the
illegal project. Now, the government position is that the project should go
ahead because it has already been started! In response to these illegal acts by
the politicians, senior officials in the ministries directly affected by the
illegal decision have bravely started an online petition to stop the canal
(Kavita Prasad, 2012).
Some observers think online petitions are useless. India,
however, has an innovation that is worthy of testing. The Parliament of India
has established a Committee on Petitions. It examines every petition referred
to it. It's website goes onto to say, "The recommendations of the
Committee on the Petition will be presented in the form of a Report to the
Rajya Sabha where after the recommendations will receive the consideration of
the appropriate Ministry of the Government of India. This process will be
monitored by the Committee on Petitions" (Rajya Sabha Secretariat, 2013).
Petitions do work in India. A good example was a recent
petition to abolish the practice of untouchability in a small village near the
Ranthambore Tiger Reserve.
In just five days, more than 5000 people signed an online
petition in 2012 that forced a District Magistrate to call a Public Hearing.
The Magistrate ordered an end to the tradition that forced Dalit women to take
off their footwear when they pass through so called “upper caste”
neighbourhoods. The Villagers of Dangariya promised to stop this practice (See http://www.change.org/en-CA/petitions/untouchability-abolished-in-dangariya-rajasthan).
Now, citizens everywhere who love tigers now also have an
opportunity to register their opposition to the canal at another online
petition site (See http://www.thepetitionsite.com/981/646/173/stop-illegal-canal-in-tiger-reserve/.
To visit
or not to visit Ranthambore Tiger Reserve?
In 1980, the former private hunting grounds of Chieftains and the Maharajas of Jaipur were turned into Ranthambore National Park. In 1992, the Tiger Reserve was expanded to include the adjoining Keladevi Sanctuary and Sawai Mansingh sanctuary along with other forests. As a result, today, the tiger reserve covers an area of 1334 sq. km.
According to the latest census by the National Tiger Conservation Authority, the tiger population in India increased to 1,706 in 2011 from 1,411 in 2008 (Pidd, 2013). Yet, the immense population of India, which will grow to 1.6 billion people by mid-century (2013), reduces the area where wildlife can co-exist with humans.
According to the latest census by the National Tiger Conservation Authority, the tiger population in India increased to 1,706 in 2011 from 1,411 in 2008 (Pidd, 2013). Yet, the immense population of India, which will grow to 1.6 billion people by mid-century (2013), reduces the area where wildlife can co-exist with humans.
Tourist fascination with tigers causes widespread concern both in India and elsewhere in the world. Visitors to tiger reserves wonder about their positive and negative impacts on the tiger population. The dilemma, to visit or not to visit, surely challenges visitors to the Reserve.
There are no reliable
figures about visitors to Sawai Madhopur. However, according to an article in
the 20 August 2012 Guardian, in 2011, 288,000 tickets were sold to visitors for
national park entry (Pidd, 2013).
Not everyone shows up
for his or her visit. As a result, I saw a strong informal market in operation
amongst locals. They obtained the seats of the no-shows at the Ranthambore
Tiger Reserve Tourist Centre. There were so many locals at the "current
booking window" that it was a struggle for me, a tourist, to get to the
window. Instead, the locals got the boarding passes of the "no-shows"
to sell to "walk-up" visitors. The seats would be sold to visitors
for their own profit. As a result, there were no empty seats in the jeeps
during my visit. For, everyone wanted to use jeeps for their safari.
During my visit, I
normally saw four to six vehicles in the same zone that I was visiting. A
maximum of 40 vehicles with a total of 520 tourists are in the park at any one
time. Tourists are only allowed in the park for six hours (two intervals of
three hours each) every day. Supporters of tourism in the park say the visitors
only have access to one quarter of the park area (McCarthy, 2012).
Poachers kill tigers
that fetch lucrative prices in China, Japan, Viet Nam, Southeast Asia (Sharma,
2000) for its fur. Therefore, Guides
volunteer to patrol the park from sunrise to sunset. Tourists and guides deter
poachers of the tigers. Visitors also reduce illegal grazing and illegal
woodcutting. That is why a significant number of knowledgeable observers say it
would be a disaster if the government were to close core areas of tiger
reserves to visitors.
India's Wildlife Protection Act requires
that core areas of tiger reserves, currently only 1 percent of Indian's
landmass, to be "inviolate." Yet, during the past six years, field
biologist Dharmendra Khandal says 20 percent of the land where tigers live in
India, has been lost in the past six years to human population growth,
agriculture, and to mines (McCarthy, 2012).
Yet, critics question
the presence of visitors in core areas of tiger habitat in the park. They
remind us about the injustice of tribal people being forced out of their
villages inside the park. Then the Government of India throws open the doors of
Ranthambore National Park to foreign ecotourists like me without adequately
empowering the forest-dependent poor to raise their standard of living.
The bottom line in
controversies like this is usually economics. If the locals around the tiger
reserve cannot make money on tourism, some of them would poach tigers for the
money instead. They will get their money one way or another. Thus, most conservation experts say poaching is a bigger problem
than tourism.
Conservation
issues at Ranthambore National Park:
Aditya Singh, an avid
wildlife photographer, conservationist, activist and engineer, moved to
Ranthambhore in 1998. He has a collection of wonderful photos of tigers at
Ranthambore on his website (See http://ranthambhore.com/about-us/).
It has news about Ranthambore and its surroundings too.
Villagers inside and
close to the Ranthambore tiger reserve are mainly agricultural, pastoral and
farm workers. They all depend on the natural resources of the reserve.
The Goggle Earth
Satellite image for the location of my tiger encounter clearly tells the story.
There are fields and villages all around the little "island" where
the tigers cling to life in Zone 9. A large group of structures appears to the
south of the encounter location is a historic Hindu temple.
Travel Operators for
Tigers run a campaign with several objectives. It believes in "Well
conceived, well planned and well managed tourism is a critical tool in wildlife
conservation, rural and community development and sustainable
livelihoods." They explain the conservation issues around Ranthambore
using the Zone of Influence (ZI) concept (2012).
The Zone of Influence
(ZI) of the reserve is thought to be within 10 km of the legal boundaries of
reserve. Four villages are inside the Core and Buffer zone of Ranthambore
National Park. Sawai Madhopur sanctuary possesses three villages (2012).
The photo below shows an
example of a potential conflict between animals in the sanctuary and livestock
from nearby farms and villages. The Sambar shares river water with a herd of
goats from a nearby farm. A man stands at the top of the riverbank in a grassy
opening. It appears he is a herder keeping watch on his goats. Interestingly,
the Sambar appears to be more concerned about our presence in the jeep rather
than the herd and the herder.
Nonetheless, the photo
does provide evidence of potential conflicts. Domestic animals and wild animals
could easily cross the river. Wild animals could cross the river to raid crops
while domestic animals could be easy meat for tigers if they stray into the
reserve. For we all know, the grass is always greener on the other side! In
crossing over, conflicts will surely occur in Zone 9.
| A Sambar shares river water with farm animals while a herder watches from the hillside (location 189). |
The Goggle Earth
Satellite image of location 189 clearly shows the location of a nearby farm. It
is about 250 m away from the location where we encountered the small herd of
goats on the river bed. Intense grazing on both sides of the river indicates
the likelihood of conflicts between predators and prey in Zone 9.
What is more, in 1991,
there were 332 villages within 5 km. radius of the Reserve. There are 112
villages within two km of the reserve boundary! Authorities call this zone an
"eco-development zone" (2012). The people in this zone believe they
own resource use rights in the tiger reserve. And they get angry when they are
stopped from using it. As a result, the villagers never stop trying to invade
the core area of the park. The reserve areas outside the park experience the
same pressures.
In response to threats
to tiger survival, a new conservation organization called the Tiger Nation has
been established. Using the power of social media, cutting edge ID methods, and
the world's leading tiger experts, the Tiger Nation uses 'people-powered
conservation.' It documents the identity of tigers in all tiger reserves in
India, provides population counts and runs an international campaign to save
the tigers. Through its campaign, the Tiger Nation (See www.tigernation.org) has found that Ranthambore Tiger
Reserve, one of 42 tiger sanctuaries in India, currently has a tiger population
of 31. According to the Tiger Nation website, "Today, Ranthambhore’s tiger
numbers are the highest they’ve been since Emperors battled over the ruined
[Ranthambore Fort] ramparts above."
Thus, I will do a small
duty as a conservation photographer for the sake of tiger survival in India. I
will upload my best photo of the tiger to the Tiger Nation website. It can
confirm its identity. In addition, my sighting will enlarge its GPS dataset,
thus, documenting the tiger movement in Zone 9. However, a membership will be
necessary to give my photograph. Currently, it costs C$39 for a one-year
subscription. Expense way for me to freely share my information but I will do it for
tiger survival!
Can tigers survive in India?
Most of our planet's
charismatic and endangered species owe their existence to special, protected
areas and reserves on every continent. Wild tigers at the most westerly
location on Earth are no exception to this great and urgent need for
protection. Ranthambore Tiger Reserve, one of the world's 600 wildlife reserves
(Riley and Riley, 2005), has become one of the great reserves on earth to
fulfill this urgent need to protect tigers. Yet, tiger survival and even the
integrity of the sanctuary itself are still in crisis at Ranthambore. Can
tigers survive in India? This appears to be an open question. For the answer is
blowin’ in the desert wind!
Tiger Photo album:
All photos by Larry
Joseph, copyright, 2013.
Nikon D7000
Lens:
wide-angle zoom, AF-S,
Nikkor, 12-24 mm, 1:4 G ED,
telephoto, zoom, AF-S,
Nikkor, 50-300 mm, 1:4.5-5.6 G ED, VR,
telephoto, zoom, AF‐S, Nikkor, 200‐400 mm, 1:4 G
|
|
| Male tiger (T42) about 25 m. from the jeep. |
| This is my best side! |
What immortal hand or eye Dare frame thy fearful symmetry? (W.Blake) |
| Like human fingerprints, strips on the side of its body provide conclusive identity. |
References:
Indus Valley Civilization. In: Worldmark Encyclopedia
of Cultures and Daily Life (2006): Gale Group.
Minas. In: Worldmark Encyclopedia of Cultures and
Daily Life (2009) Chicago: Gale Group.
Indian Scheduled Tribes (2011a) http://www.indianetzone.com/37/indian_scheduled_tribes.htm
(accessed April 24, 2013, 2013) (Type of Medium).
Indian Tribes (2011b) (accessed May 6, 2013, 2013) (Type of Medium).
Ranthambhore: Park Issues Conservation Issues (2012a) http://www.toftigers.org/Ranthambhore%20Tiger%20Reserve/Ranthambhore%20Park%20Issues
(accessed April 5, 2013, 2013) (Type of Medium).
The Role of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples within the United Nations Human Rights System, a Handbook
for Indigenous Leaders in the United States (2012b) Tucson: The University of
Arizona Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy Program.
Breaking up Indian states The good of small things.
In: The Economist online (2013a) London: The Economist Newspaper Limited 2013.
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In:
Wikipedia (2013b): Wikimedia Foundation.
Heart failure led to tigress’s death at Ranthambore
National Park In: Daily Bhaskar.com (2013c) Jaipur: DB Corp ltd.
Indigenous peoples in India (2013d) http://www.iwgia.org/regions/asia/india
(accessed May 23, 2013, 2013) (Type of Medium).
Meena. In: Wikipedia (2013e): Wikipedia
Tigress found dead at Ranthambore. In: The Times of
India (2013f) Jaipur: Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd.
Afroz Alam VS, Shiv Charan Sharma Bryoflora of
Ranthambhore Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan (India). In: Archive For Bryology (2011)
Banasthali Vidyapith- 302044 (Rajasthan) India: Department of Bioscience and
Biotechnology. 8.
Aitchison JC, Ali JR, Davis AM. When and where did
India and Asia collide? Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (2007)
112:B05423.
Alka Barua HA, Pradeep Kumar. Care and support of
unmarried Adolescent Girls in Rajasthan. Economic & Political Weekly
(2007):9.
International Labour Organization (ILO). Monitoring
indigenous and tribal peoples’ rights through ILO Conventions: a compilation of
ILO supervisory bodies’ comments 2009-2010 (2010) Geneva: International Labour
Office.
International Labour Organization (ILO). Indigenous
and Tribal Peoples (2012) http://www.ilo.org/indigenous/lang--en/index.htm
(accessed May 5, 2013, 2013) (Type of Medium).
Kaur P, Zeh A, Chaudhri N, Gerdes A, Okrusch M.
Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic crustal evolution of the Aravalli mountain range,
NW India, and its hinterland: The U–Pb and Hf isotope record of detrital
zircon. Precambrian Research (2011) 187:155-164.
McCarthy J. Tourists Banned From India's Tiger
Reserves. In: NPR (2012) Washington, DC 20002: National Public Radio.
Pidd H. Tiger population of India facing 'total
disaster' due to tourism ban. In: theguardian (2013) London: Guardian News and
Media Limited.
Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Petitions-Procedure for
submission (2013) http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/petition/petition.asp
(accessed May 22, 2013, 2013) (Type of Medium).
Riley L, Riley W. Nature's strongholds : the world's
great wildlife reserves. (2005)
Princeton, N.J. ; Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
Sharma HS. Ranthambhore Sanctuary: Dilemma of
Eco-development. (2000) New Delhi:
Concept Publishing Company.
Srivastava DC, Sahay, Amit. Brittle tectonics and pore-fluid
conditions in the evolution of the Great Boundary Fault around Chittaurgarh,
Northwestern India. Journal of Structural Geology (2003) 25:11.
Xaxa V. Tribes as Indigenous People of India. Economic
and Political Weekly (1999) 34:3589-3595.
Yogesh Shrivastava PJ. Biodiversity in Folk-Beliefs
and Practices among the Tribals of Rajasthan. In: Journal of Human Ecology
(2001) Jaipur: Kamla-Raj. 141-146.




Your work is beautiful, enlightening and needs to be seen and read throughout the world Larry! Both of us are very pleased to have met you and hope to be able to get together with you again soon! I will do my utmost to promote what you do and your amazing photographs,
ReplyDeleteStanza